InvestorIdeas.com | big ideas for the small cap investor

search subscribe advertise submitnews

   research       membership       insiders corner       investor alerts       audio       marketplace       green investor       stock directories       trading center       JOBS     

On-line HDS conference update – follow the money! 

By Allen R. Gibson
Oct 2004

The Department of Homeland Security since its inception has been very cognisant of the fact that much of today’s cutting edge technology has been, and is being, developed in the commercial sector, often by small, companies. In order to respond to the urgent needs of the DHS in the wake of 9-11, the agency spread its procurement wings wide, and entrepreneurs have been rushing to fill its needs every since.

“This has led to some spectacular successes among small companies in fields where the government mandated not only budgets but timelines for implementation,” says Brian Ruttenbur: Equity Research Analyst at   Morgan Keegan & Co. He notes that only 2 pieces of legislation post-911 had both money and deadlines attached.

$12 Billion has been spent on airports, where companies such as L3 and Envision did really well. And secondly the US Visit program has committed $10 Billion to Accenture, and its subcontractors, to enhance identification and security of visitors to the US, by installing multiple-biometric, machine-readable travel document systems at points of entry into the US.

In other areas, such as biodefense, where there exists budget legislation but no mandated timelines, progress has been slower, much to the frustration of some companies with good technology but no market. As the current flap over vaccines indicates, there have been large budget announcements for Project Bioshield, but little in the way of significant contracts signed.

What will happen in terms of timeline mandates is going to be greatly affected by the results of the upcoming Presidential election. The two candidates have different priorities and approaches to the war on terror, and to how the DHS will play its role.

That said, however, it remains clear that significant new spending on homeland security issues will be coming in the next few years, both from the federal and state governments, and perhaps even more so from private enterprises, as the government moves to shift some responsibility for security onto the private sector.

So the market for security technologies is expected to remain strong and, depending on what form the next terrorist attack takes, to grow in new, unpredictable ways. Jack Mallon of Mallon's Security Report says “Everything bodes well for the security industry in the immediate future.”

Among the many companies striving to secure America both at home and abroad were the participants in the recent HomelandDefenseStocks.com on-line forum. Each of these companies is focussed on a specific security need with technologies that often have other applications as well. This is a really useful approach, according to Paladin Capital Group’s Dr. Alf Andreassen., who says his security investment fund focuses on Co. ’s with “dual-use commercial applications that can expand into the government’s security market.”  

The Current Focus

Two areas that are priorities in homeland defense budgets are:

Border/Infrastructure Protection: includes ports, containers, plants, and water supplies. Security can often involve locating, identifying, and tracking perpetrators: Includes biometrics, surveillance, and tracking of people and vehicles, as well as less-lethal weaponry.

Biological Threat detection and countermeasures.  

Border / Infrastructure. 

“Rail and port/border security seems to be heating up,” says Brian Ruttenbur. “Bills to mandate spending on these are before both houses, with a lot of talk in the Presidential campaigns on this issue.”

Infrastructure protection can take many forms. Companies that are involved in this sector include Snocone Systems, Bulldog Technologies, AEGIS Assessments, Law Enforcement Technologies, Global Matrechs, Extreme CCTV, Roaming Messenger and Wave Dispersion Technologies.

Aegis Assessments has built wireless communications products for both building security and for First Responder radio interoperability. Their very 1st “Safety-Net Radio Bridge,” which allows up to up to 8 different radio-frequency systems to be integrated on-site, was purchased by DHS for testing, and has been under continuous improvement for the past two years.

Markland Technologies is involved in a number of key defense technologies through its various subsidiaries, including Remote Sensors and Border Security. The Company forecasts 100% growth this year.

Snocone Systems has developed a software package that turns any WAP 2.0 cellphone into a remote CCTV controller/viewer. Users can monitor their security cameras over the phone, and even send frame-grabs via email for instant analysis and identification!

Extreme CCTV designs and manufactures extreme application, all environment high performance CCTV camera systems and infrared illuminators for technical surveillance day and night.

Bulldog Technologies have developed the “Boss” series of wireless security systems for use in the global freight industry. Units attached to the locking mechanisms on containers or trucks transmit continuous updates as to their status, and have successfully prevented thefts at container ports in South America.

Navicom Wireless. Offers wireless asset tracking with a vehicle “Black Box” – a compact GPS locator Integrated with cellular technology and the vehicles electrical system. Low cost provider of vehicle location and recovery service. www.navicomgps.com 

Global Matrechs. Their “EKOR” radiation-resistant spray-on material for the containment and safer transport of radioactive materials was originally developed for the Chernobyl site. There are now 12 different derivatives available.

Wave Dispersion Technologies is a private company that has created two very successful marine barrier products. Each is a floating breakwater – one designed to mitigate wave damage and beach erosion called WhisprWave, the other a portable small-craft intrusion barrier that is increasingly being used by the Military to protect vital installations.  

Civil Defense

Homeland Security also involves the technologies and countermeasures employed by our First Responders, and to that end there is considerable innovation and upgrading going on among First Responders. A primary issue identified in the aftermath of 9-11 was the need for better communication between departments.

Companies involved in this sector include: Taser, Onscreen Technology, Roaming Messenger, MDM Group and Law Enforcement Technologies.

Roaming Messenger packages time-critical information and decision points into a ‘smart courier’ message. The result is a messenger that roams throughout the wired and wireless worlds - from mobile devices to desktop PCs to central servers - tracking down people and getting responses to critical incidents in real-time.

Onscreen Technology has created portable LED video displays utilizing a revolutionary patent pending architecture that enables rapid visual communication to the masses during catastrophic events. The screens are easy to set up, and can run off the power supply of any vehicle.

Non-lethal Weapons: Taser, by far the most famous and widely used electrical ‘stun gun’ on the market, has still only reached 8% penetration in the US Law Enforcement Market, meaning it and its competitors have lots of room for growth. And competitors are coming!

Law Enforcement Associates, a security and surveillance technology company, has approved the final housing designs for its new stun gun. The Co. has a projected March 2005 launch date for its pistol-like weapon.

MDM Group Inc. is working on ShockRounds™. Fired from existing weapons,  a ShockRounds low-velocity specialized bullet generates an extremely high voltage charge upon impact. The effect is similar to a Taser, but with much longer range.  

Biological Threat Protection

With the passing of the Project Bioshield bill earlier this year promising $5.6 Billion over ten years, it was expected there would be a flood of money into countermeasures for biological attacks. So far, that hasn’t happened.

Part of the problem could be the complexity of the task. And while Project Biowatch has installed monitor and sensing equipment for airborne agents at the nation’s most at-risk cities, it is still far form certain how we would be able to respond even if an attack was identified by those sensors.

The government has so far not followed through on its announced plans to stockpile millions of doses of Anthrax vaccine. Hospital infrastructure, while being upgraded, is still far from adequate to meet a large-scale attack. And terrorists potentially have access to many more deadly toxins than vaccines exist for anyway! The picture is not encouraging.

Fortunately, there are companies working on options. Among them is Aethlon Medical, who have created a blood filtration device called a Hemopurifier that holds out hope of being an effective countermeasure to a wide range of biological attacks.

The Homepurifier is essentially a ‘vacuum cleaner’ for the blood that removes virus components. So far, it has proven remarkably effective against HIV and Hepatitis C, and is now being tested against bioweapons.

         Other alternatives are also being explored by other companies, but judging by the public information, at least, there is much more work required in developing an effective suite of responses to a bioterror attack. Not to mention the work needed on the potential of a ‘dirty’ nuclear-tinged device being detonated anywhere in the USA , perhaps fuelled by some of the tons of high explosives that have been spirited away by insurgents in Iraq .

In conclusion:

         While the Nation’s ‘away game’ has lowered considerably the odds of  terrorists physically entering our country, the domestic preparedness in the event that they DO manage to smuggle in WMD’s or a biological or nuclear nature remains dubious.

          Were such an event to take place, there is little doubt that investments in many of the companies outlined here would skyrocket. For investors, it is a catch-22 situation. While no one wants to bet on a new terrorist attack, in the event that a large scale attack does take place, it only makes sense to hold some security stocks in one’s portfolio to defend against the losses that may be experienced in sectors negatively affected by the attacken R. Gibson

Allen R. Gibson
Editor


Allen R. Gibson has over twenty-five years of experience in media and corporate communications.  He has been a reporter, television producer, and marketing communications consultant for public companies in both the US and Canada.
 

Disclaimer: www.InvestorIdeas.com/About/Disclaimer.asp, www.homelanddefensestocks.com/Companies/HomelandDefense/Disclaimer.asp

©Copyright InvestorIdeas 2004

 


ECON Corporate Services, Inc.

© 2000 - 2008 InvestorIdeas.com®, ECON

about us | partners / links | company showcase | contact | employment | disclaimer | privacy policy | sitemap